I think many today actually think because they don't hear from God that this means He does not exist and that science and the so called theory and it is just that a theory of evolution proves this.
However as life goes on it only actually serves to disprove this.
Take the complexity of DNA alone and so many other things, even in creation itself, and how everything has to be there from the start, otherwise it simply won't all work properly.
An example for you from my main home page which contains more evidence for you:

Mouse trap and a single human cell examples - Click here for the picture of the single human cell

Behe starts with the example of a mousetrap; he claims that a standard mousetrap is "irreducibly complex". Such a mousetrap consists of:

        (1) a flat wooden platform to act as a base

        (2) a metal hammer, which does the actual job of crushing
        the little mouse

        (3) a spring with extended ends to press against the platform and
        the hammer when the trap is charged

        (4) a sensitive catch that releases the hammer when slight pressure
        is applied

        (5) a metal bar that connects to the catch and charged hammer
        (there are also assorted staples to hold the system together)

Behe then continues with his logic as to why this system is "irreducibly complex":

Which part could be missing and still allow you to catch a mouse? If the wooden base were gone, there would be no platform for attaching the other components. If the hammer were gone, the mouse could dance all night on the platform without becoming pinned to the wooden base. If there were no spring, the hammer and platform would jangle loosely, and again the rodent would be unimpeded. If there were no catch or metal holding bar, then the spring would snap the hammer shut as soon as you let go of it...

A mousetrap cannot “evolve” slowly, bit by bit. All of the parts must be in place at the same time. The same with such things as DNA.

    "Truth" 3: Life began as simple, single-celled organisms

Darwin wrote his theory in the 19th century when it was believed that a cell was just “a homogeneous globule of protoplasm.” They did not know about DNA or the complex processes that go on inside a cell. Today, we know that there is no such thing as a "simple" cell.

"Each cell in the human body contains more information than in all thirty volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica. It's certainly reasonable to make the inference that this isn't the random product of unguided nature, but it's the unmistakable sign of an Intelligent Designer.
 Walter L. Bradley,
 The Mystery of Life's Origin

---

So what about the DNA and space and this and that, well:

http://www.allaboutscience.org/darwins-theory-of-evolution-video.htm
http://www.allaboutscience.org/dna-double-helix-video.htm
http://www.allaboutscience.org/big-bang-theory-video.htm
http://www.allaboutscience.org/theory-of-relativity-video.htm

---

In fact it is when we finally have an open mind and do our own research and study we also find the truth. That truth leads us to only one conclusion of course and that is life is far to complex to have just evolved by so called random chance.
But as usual I deal with fact and my motto saying never take my word for anything, do your own research and study, however I love as always to give you a head start, because I love revealing truth. One day I'll stand before God after all and have to give account and knowing this truth how can I not pass it on to you, right.

Living cells contain thousands of different chemicals, some acidic, others basic. Many chemicals would react with others were it not for an intricate system of chemical barriers and buffers. If living things evolved, these barriers and buffers must also have evolved—but at just the right time to prevent harmful chemical reactions. How could such precise, seemingly coordinated, virtually miraculous events have happened for each of millions of species?^a

All living organisms are maintained by thousands of chemical pathways, each involving a long series of complex chemical reactions. For example, the clotting of blood, which involves 20–30 steps, is absolutely vital to healing a wound. However, clotting could be fatal if it happened inside the body. Omitting one of the many steps, inserting an unwanted step, or altering the timing of a step would probably cause death. If one thing goes wrong, all the earlier marvelous steps that worked flawlessly were in vain. Evidently, these complex pathways were created as an intricate, highly integrated system.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences36.html

---

No one has ever found an organism that never had a parent of some sort. Today, this is one of the most accepted facts in biology. All living things are produced from one or more parents. Surprisingly, however, many modern people still faithfully believe in a form of "spontaneous generation."

Materialists assume life arose spontaneously somewhere in ancient Earth's water supply water which contained absolutely no life, just minerals and chemical substances used by living things. [119]

Because oxygen in the atmosphere would destroy all possibility of life arising by natural processes, materialists wrongly assumed the atmosphere had no oxygen. [120] They also assumed it contained certain necessary ingredients, including ammonia, nitrogen, hydrogen, water vapor and methane. [121] However, it is well known that mixing these ingredients does not create life. Therefore, materialists theorized something else must be needed perhaps a bolt of energy. [122]

Dr. Stanley Miller and Dr. Sidney Fox were two of the first scientists to attempt laboratory experiments aimed at trying to prove that life could arise spontaneously. They designed a Pyrex apparatus containing methane, ammonia, and water vapor, but no oxygen. Through this mixture they passed electric sparks to simulate lightning strikes. [123]

What was the result? No life was produced, of course, but the electricity did combine some atoms to form amino acids.

amino acids: compounds that are the simplest units out of which proteins can be assembled. [124]

Did the Miller/Fox experiment prove that life could eventually have arisen in some ancient sea struck by lightning? No, their results actually weakened the case. The mixture of amino acids and other simple chemicals produced is not correct for producing life. All known life uses amino acids which are exclusively of the "left-handed" form. [125]

DNA is a super-molecule which stores coded hereditary information. It consists of two long "chains" of chemical "building blocks" paired together. In humans, the strands of DNA are almost 2 yards long [approx. 1.82 meters], yet less than a trillionth of an inch thick [approx. 0.0000254 microns]. [135]

In function, DNA is somewhat like a computer program on a floppy disk. It stores and transfers encoded information and instructions. It is said that the DNA of a human stores enough information code to fill 1,000 books each with 500 pages of very small, closely-printed type. [136] The DNA code produces a product far more sophisticated than that of any computer.

Amazingly, this enormous set of instructions fits with ease within a single cell and routinely directs the formation of entire adult humans, starting with just a single fertilized egg. Even the DNA of a bacterium is highly complex, containing at least 3 million units [137], all aligned in a very precise, meaningful sequence.

DNA and the molecules that surround it form a truly superb mechanism a miniaturized marvel. The information is so compactly stored that the amount of DNA necessary to code all the people living on our planet might fit into a space no larger than an aspirin tablet! [138]

Many scientists are convinced that cells containing such a complex code and such intricate chemistry could never have come into being by pure, undirected chemistry. [139] No matter how chemicals are mixed, they do not create DNA spirals or any intelligent code whatsoever. Only DNA reproduces DNA.

Two well known scientists calculated the odds of life forming by natural processes. They estimated that there is less than 1 chance in 10^40,000 that life could have originated by random trials. 10 to the 40,000th is a 1 with 40,000 zeros after it! [140]

Again for the entire article please click here

---

Fnially the answers that you want to questions you have can all be found at the following links, take a look, you've nothing to lose and everything in fact to gain.
http://www.creationists.org/faqs.html
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp
http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/menu-humans.html
http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/menu-fossils.html
http://www.creationism.org/batman/index.htm
http://www.creationism.org/mp3/index.htm
http://www.creationism.org/videos/index.htm
http://www.allaboutcreation.org/proof-of-god.htm
http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/menu-catastrophe.html
http://creationanswers.net/

Also see my other pages:
Evidence for creation
Creation not Evolution
Scripture proving creation

It is interesting that in light of new evidence those that do finally accept the previous is obviously now flawed, still won't accept there is a creator and so a God that one day when they die they will be held accountable to.
This poses the problem then of shifting their ideas, in light of new evidence it means they have to shift the goals. If the ball won't any longer go in the net where it should, move the goal posts until it does, or rather until it appears to the referee and crowd as if the ball had gone in.

What I'm basically saying is, while those that follow creation and the Bible, and the meaning of God being the same yesterday, today and forever, certainly rings true. This means we never change our idea and new evidence only sures up the Bible not evolution in any form.
Those that have often set out to disprove the Bible have ended up becoming believers of Yeshua (Jesus) and Yahweh, (God) simply because they finally see that what is says, predicts and so on has come true, often hundreds of years before.

We only have to look at the predictions concerning Yeshua alone:
Was Jesus coming foretold
More scripture telling of Jesus first coming

However even many Christians believe, or rather still struggle with and follow one of satan's biggest lies about not wanting to be robots.
'You don't want to follow God, you don't want to be a robot, do your own thing, go on.'
We learn nothing, satan like God never changes either, read Genesis chapter 3 and that is where it comes from.
Of course we do, even Christians, not walking the walk close to God, struggling in faith, fooled by the world, and so many other pressures, fall for this.

So we do our own thing, get into trouble and then blame a loving God.
For example, we want to smoke, do drugs, drink and eat junk food.
Like everything satan offers at first, sin is awesome, heck if it wasn't and satan told the truth, that this drug will ruin you, and cause trouble, make you steal money and cost you dearly in your family and friends circle and maybe even your life, you'd soon be saying no thanks and get lost.

However, we sadly don't and at first it is awesome, we are in control, we can stop anytime, cause we can, and we love it, it's nice, sex, drink, awesome, makes us forget any hard times, even better let's combine it, ohhhh the drugs and sex and drink, wow, I'm in heaven.
THEN BANG, arghhh, I have a sexually transmitted disease, GRRRRRRRR. ARGHHHHHH I have liver failure, GRRRRR, arghhhh I have cancer, GRRRRRRRR.
The Bible however a collection of letter carefully looked after for a few thousand years that we have existed is acutally a manual for life, a love letter from a caring God.
In fact unlike satan, see my powerful testimony, God is a gentleman and far from wanting you to be a robot acutally does not control you, giving you freedom of choice. Sadly it is those choices we make that get us into such trouble.
However as usual you want proof, not my boring words, right?
What about Honey then and cancer and foods we eat, well, what does the Bible say and how do we choose to live our lives compared to what God in His awesome manual for life (the Bible) tell us.
Honey the answer to staying healthy
Do you or someone you know have cancer?
Was Jesus genuine or false

Finally I have you saying, okay then Lee, I'm least interested, but what makes you so sure, 100% correct.
My reply would be, if I'm wrong, no worries, right, however if I'm right, or rather the Bible is right, which so far everything it has ever predicted has come true, then you could be in trouble.
Along with evolution one of the biggest lies of satan over the past few decades has been this so called doing good gets you into heaven.
If finally I have your attention and your thinking, okay, maybe there is a heaven and real hell then, but God is a loving God right, won't He over look the things I've done and let me into heaven. Well, if you think being a good person, the greatest lie along with evolution, will get you a ticket into heaven we need again to find out the truth to why Jesus said you had to be born again. Click here now to see if just being a good person will get you into heaven from a loving God.
God Bless you so much, Lee.